|
Keith David Henry was born and raised in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. By trade he is a Certified Systems Engineer, a Certified Trainer, and a published author. He has been an Information Technology professional for over thirty years, and has been an adult educator since 1986.
Keiths eclectic background includes more than thirty-three years as a religionist, an artist, a creative and technical writer, and an adult educator. His involvement with and interest in particle physics theory early on in his vocational career and up to this date, his proclivity toward astro-physics theory, and his general aptitude for scientific cogitation adds a technical edge to his fluent, easy-to-read, and pleasant writing style which is accented by his clever wit and skillful prose. His books explore a broad range of esoteric human cosmology incorporating science, philosophy, and metaphysics into his quest to answer the age old questions about the human race, Who Are We, Where Did We Come From, Why Are We Here, and Where Are We Going. Keith believes that the quest for knowledge should yield many more questions than it does answers, emphatically asserting that the question is much more important than the answer. Having previously been an ordained Pentecostal Minister for a church in Philadelphia he later turned his sights to more esoteric pursuits, becoming conscientiously involved in the study and practice of various metaphysical disciplines. His reevaluation of mainstream religion coupled with his trademark sense of curiosity and propensity toward research opened up a whole new venue of expression for him. He prides himself on his wide range of general knowledge within this venue and has over the years become a Theoretical Metaphysicist. __________________________________________________________________________ "I'm participating in my own insanity just like everyone else is. The only difference may be that I know I'm insane. How about you? There can be no greater or more productive realization in one's life than to discover that we are all individuals with our own unique perspectives. On the strength of this internal paradigm shift we can live in true harmony and balance within ourselves and accept our neighbors' madness with equal validation as we do our own. This is the only sustainable path to world peace. Oddly, then, this paradox of individuality which manifests the pre-exsiting actuality of our oneness is what many 'spiritual masters' throughout history have attempted to teach us. (i.e. the kingdom of heaven is within YOU) It's no wonder that they have been greatly misunderstood. This is my goal in life: To be me... to find out what that means, to embrace this search even though I don't fully understand it, and the world social, religious, and plotiical systems - by and large - discourage it, and to share it with others, not just with words, but by embodying this understanding incrementally to the degree that I am able." - Keith David Henry |
|
|
In presenting to the public the thesis of this particular address the speaker is overawed by a twofold realization. He is aware, first, that the interpretation of all ancient Holy Writ which he here offers will be disruptive of the established creedal religions of the Western world. And, in the second place he knows that the presentment will fall with such astonishing force upon Occidental religious thought as to seem incredible in spite of an array of positive testimony certifying its correctness. He may well be pardoned a feeling of hesitation and dubiety in making the revelation, for it has involved him in a daring incursion into interpretative terrain whither no scholar has penetrated before him. From the penetralia of that little-trodden domain of ancient religion-mystery he brings forth into modern light a discovery that will severely tax all the resources of common acceptance. Traditional norms of thought do not readily relax their grip on the general mind. It is scarcely to be hoped that an announcement so subversive of accepted ideas in religion and theology will be received without scepticism or resentment, since it invades a field in which conservatism is most stolidly rooted. Traditions long institutionalized do not easily bend to correction of principles basically vital to their very existence. Yet truth demands insistently from her devotees her inexorable tribute of sincerity and courage, and scholarship must flinch no duty in the line of truth-seeking. Christianity, as a system of exclusive sacred truth or a unique revelation of divine wisdom, is already reeling under the impact of one blow after another dealt it by the study of Comparative Religion and Comparative Mythology. The "deadly parallels" found to run so consistently and so strikingly between the life of the Gospel Jesus and the legends of some twenty or more antecedent Christly figures or Sun-gods, in the role of world-saviors, are rapidly piling up the evidence that tends to jeopardize the validity of the entire body of Gospel narrative as history. It is beginning to dawn on intelligent and informed students that the New Testament Gospels are not the biography of any "person" or living character at all, but are old dramatic books of the religious Brotherhoods, portraying, not the "life" of any man, but only the spiritual history of a typical figure. All previous Messianic characters, or Sun-gods, were only such typal dramatizations of man’s inner life, under the form of a representative "history". The Christs were simply ideal figures held up before men to provide them with an inspiring picture of their own attainable perfection. Unbelievable as it may appear, it is the fact of history that with the lapse of time and the decay of philosophical culture, the more ignorant came to take these dramatic heroes for actually living persons. And a designing priestcraft, either itself now sunken in similar ignorance, or motivated by piety or knavery, or both, found it advantageous to the interests of a worldly ecclesiastical system to connive at the misunderstanding. At any rate, the Gospels, which were only spiritual allegories (see the writings of Philo, Clement and Origen, and note Paul’s statement that the story of Abraham, Sarah and Hagar "is an allegory"), were about the third century converted into literal history. And it was at this juncture that the ancient meaning of the term "death" passed out of the ken of even the most learned of the leaders of Christianity, and with it fled all possibility of retaining or regaining the deep inner sense of the scheme of theology. |
|


