  "TERRA: Return of the Divine Feminine" by Keith David Henry: The world today is faced with the gravest dilemmas of all time. Every major system is beginning to disintegrate. This global phenomenon is happening across social, political, financial, religious, environmental, and moral lines. The artificially masculine - the monotheistic patriarchal and oligarchic paradigm in which we currently live - is in large part responsible for this breakdown. This book, the third in the Architects of the Aquarian Age Trilogy, examines the role that the renewed respect for and acceptance of the Divine Feminine integrated with the true Divine Masculine will play during this age. It uncovers the mystery of the Divine Feminine manifested in physical reality as illuminated by the intricacies of Sacred Geometry and redefines the commonly held meaning of "spirit". It also delves into the science and esotery behind the Mayan calendar, our progression of consciousness as a species, and their implications for humanity's post-2012 existence as our planet moves into the next 26,000 year Mayan calendar astrological cycle known commonly as the Aquarian Age. "Not In His Image" by John Lamb Lash: Basing much of Not in His Image on the Nag Hammadi and other Gnostic writings, John Lamb Lash explains how a little-known messianic sect propelled itself into a dominant world power, systematically wiping out the great Gnostic spiritual teachers, the Druid priests, and the shamanistic healers of Europe and North Africa. They burned libraries and destroyed temples in an attempt to silence the ancient truth-tellers and keep their own secrets. But as Lash reveals, when the truth is the planet Earth it cannot be hidden or destroyed. Not in His Image delves deeply into the shadows of ancient Gnostic writings to reconstruct the story early Christians tried to scrub from the pages of history, exploring the richness of the ancient European Pagan spirituality—the Pagan Mysteries, the Great Goddess, Gnosis, the myths of Sophia and Gaia—and chronicles the annihilation of this Pagan European culture at the hands of Christianity. Long before the birth of Christianity, monotheism was an anomaly; Europe and the Near East flourished under the divine guidance of Sophia, the ancient goddess of wisdom. The Earth was the embodiment of Sophia and thus sacred to the people who sought fulfillment in her presence. This ancient philosophy was threatening to the emerging salvation-based creed of Christianity that was based on patriarchal dominion over the Earth and lauded personal suffering as a path to the afterlife. As Derrick Jensen points out in the afterword, in Lash's hands Jesus Christ emerges as the agent provocateur of the ruling classes.  The tenth interview by Joanna Harcourt-Smith with John Lamb Lash is about the Healing Myth. A summary of Gnostic teachings on the Sophia, with emphasis on the healing effect of Her Story, the divine power of the Organic Light, & the quest for a new image of humanity  In his interview with Leah LaChapelle of American Freedom Radio, Keith David Henry asserts that the western world, with it's patriarchal monotheistic and oligarchic world view, has discarded important elements of the divine feminine. But as we transition into the Aquarian age within both the lesser and the greater zodiac the Divine Feminine is being brought back into our consciousness. Now we are beginning to see the value of integrating the Divine Feminine and the Divine Masculine into a mozaic of balance. Add Comment  Comparative mythologist, author and teacher John Lash returns to the program to discuss "The Mysteries", Religion, Gnosticism, Mystery Schools and the alleged connection to the Globalist Elite. Many different researchers in the alternative research community claim that the elite powers are stepped in the "Mystery religions". They are accused of practicing paganism and occult rituals. Is this true? Is it true paganism? Can this myth be clarified further and can it be defined with more appropriate terminology? Topics Discussed: The Mysteries, The Pagan Mysteries, 415 AD, Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Salvationism, The Superman, Gnostics, Deification, Divine Intelligence, Pagan People, Roman Empire, Messiah, Execution of the Gnostics, Etruscans, Human Psychosis, Pathology, The Globalist Game, Serial Killers, Sociopaths, Ted Bundy, Occult Techniques, Subconscious Suggestions, Orchestration of Social Evil, Black Magic, Sophia Myth, the Re-emergence of the Mystery Schools, Theosophist, Organic Light, Counter Magic, Immunity to Resist the Dementia, Shamanism, Psilocybin Mushrooms, Iboga Cult, Voracious, The Expose of the New World Order, Archons, Mind Parasites, Pagans and much more. We continue to talk about the insertion of the idea of the Anti Christ figure into Christianity and what function this might carry on a bigger scale. John poses the question of why the Gnostics or the disciples of the Myth of Sophia, didn't do anything to protect themselves from the persecution and extermination of knowledge. Well, maybe they did in a way and this is related to the idea of the Anti-Christ. We talk about the New World Order and their plans of control to bring the planet under a One World Currency, a One World Government and a One world Religion. We talk more about the One world Religion and the presentation of a Messiah figure in 2012 and who it might be, or at least what it will be coming from. We talk about 2012, why this date if there's nothing to the planetary alignment of the ending of the Mayan Calendar around this time. We talk about Melchizedek, the Bahai Faith and how the plan might unfold. This is a really interesting discussion with some of John's most recent ideas and theories about the immediate future. At the end we also talk about the true name of Gaia and for those who are curious how you'll go about calling out the true name of Gaia. This is connected with the Planetary Tantra section on metahistory.org. Do not miss this. John Lash http://www.metahistory.org/ http://www.redicecreations.com/ Malvern Zodiac: Origin of Modern Astrology? 03/08/2011
 "At the heart of England where ancient counties meet, a beautiful terrestrial zodiac lies hidden – the Malvern Zodiac - a circle of ancient constellations carved into the landscape by the first post-glacial inhabitants of this land more than 10,000 years ago. It is obscured from the modern world by its enormous size and most of the surviving graphic outlines now form the roads, footpaths, waterways and field boundaries of a 21st century agricultural landscape. The Malvern Zodiac is the source of legends – a unique design that preceded the zodiac that we all know today. It opens a window into the dark and distant past of our ancestors and, when compared to historical documents, holds ramifications that will send shock waves through the dusty corridors of church and academia" Alan Gripton The Malvern Zodiac: The Oldest Constellation Star Map in the World   Many people have never heard the name Nikola Tesla. But he is responsible for every electronic device that we take for granted today. This is not an exaggeration. Among his most important contributions to the world - and ironically his most unknown one - is his science for taking FREE ENERGY from the atmosphere. Why is it unknown? because the US government ceased and classified all hit patents and kept the knowledge out of the public awareness for years. In the video below is presented a VERY small version of the technology that Tesla invented. Tesla's actual device is very much larger than the simple circuit you will see in the video. In the video the very simple and inexpensive circuit is used to power a cell phone. But Tesla envisioned his invention powering the entire world for FREE. So much for fossil fuels. Hey Kids... ask your grade school or high school teacher why you were never taught about Nikola Tesla's inventions... Especially the ones that can create FREE ENERGY! How To Help When Help Is Not Wanted 03/04/2011
 I am becoming increasingly disconcerted at people's propensity to ignore "new" information and to hold fast to what they believe regardless of its foundation or viability. What's strange is that the sensation I feel is not frustration, anger, or even incredulity, as appropriate a sentiment as incredulity may be under the circumstances. I just can't put my finger on the sensation I'm trying to express. Long past are the days when I would use argument in an attempt to persuade someone, not to accept my "new" information, but to simply consider it and perform due diligence in the form of the most meager effort toward researching my claims. Those days are gone forever. For one thing, I honor and respect everyone's point of view as heartily as I respect their right to have their own point of view, different though it may be from my own. It seems that in order for people to grasp "greater truths" they need to have formerly negotiated the tiny building blocks of investigation and exasperation that went into the grapple with the "lesser truths", which necessitated a willingness to look someplace - anyplace - else for something to substantively address that nagging craving for insight. Unfortunately, this type of desire is typically driven by unusual trauma, rather than pure curiosity. And I can't embrace in my sensibilities any eagerness whatsoever for someone to experience unsusual trauma, no matter how valuable the result may be. In pondering my position as one who has the best intentions in mind and, even more so, information that promises to be enormously beneficial to the person who might embrace it I can't help but think about the poor misguided idealistic doctor who invented anesthesia to minimize the pain of patients undergoing extreme surgery only to have his idea mocked and put on the shelf until some 50 years later. Today no one would even think about undergoing a gall bladder operation, or an amputation without going under first. Or how about that goofy patent clerk, Einstein, who had these really weird ideas about time and space that made him a mockery of the scientific community... until he finally was able to prove it undeniably some 12 tears later, after which he became an overnight celebrity. I could go on and on, citing Pythagoras, Plato, Copernicus, Galileo, my mother! (lord knows I wish I'd taken advantage of her knowledge and foresight when I was a younger man) My consolation is that, if given sufficient time, eventually people will come around to what is true and expedient, and abandon those things that are simply unfruitful because they are based on great inaccuracy or blatant error. Historically pure curiosity has prevailed... at least effectively. Ah! That's the sensation I've been trying to express... impatience!  (This blog is taken from an essay written by Dr. Alvin Boyd Kuhn with regard to how modern religion has lost what the ancients and the first century Christians knew about the concept of death) Download Complete 27-page Essay Here In presenting to the public the thesis of this particular address the speaker is overawed by a twofold realization. He is aware, first, that the interpretation of all ancient Holy Writ which he here offers will be disruptive of the established creedal religions of the Western world. And, in the second place he knows that the presentment will fall with such astonishing force upon Occidental religious thought as to seem incredible in spite of an array of positive testimony certifying its correctness. He may well be pardoned a feeling of hesitation and dubiety in making the revelation, for it has involved him in a daring incursion into interpretative terrain whither no scholar has penetrated before him. From the penetralia of that little-trodden domain of ancient religion-mystery he brings forth into modern light a discovery that will severely tax all the resources of common acceptance. Traditional norms of thought do not readily relax their grip on the general mind. It is scarcely to be hoped that an announcement so subversive of accepted ideas in religion and theology will be received without scepticism or resentment, since it invades a field in which conservatism is most stolidly rooted. Traditions long institutionalized do not easily bend to correction of principles basically vital to their very existence. Yet truth demands insistently from her devotees her inexorable tribute of sincerity and courage, and scholarship must flinch no duty in the line of truth-seeking. Christianity, as a system of exclusive sacred truth or a unique revelation of divine wisdom, is already reeling under the impact of one blow after another dealt it by the study of Comparative Religion and Comparative Mythology. The "deadly parallels" found to run so consistently and so strikingly between the life of the Gospel Jesus and the legends of some twenty or more antecedent Christly figures or Sun-gods, in the role of world-saviors, are rapidly piling up the evidence that tends to jeopardize the validity of the entire body of Gospel narrative as history. It is beginning to dawn on intelligent and informed students that the New Testament Gospels are not the biography of any "person" or living character at all, but are old dramatic books of the religious Brotherhoods, portraying, not the "life" of any man, but only the spiritual history of a typical figure. All previous Messianic characters, or Sun-gods, were only such typal dramatizations of man’s inner life, under the form of a representative "history". The Christs were simply ideal figures held up before men to provide them with an inspiring picture of their own attainable perfection. Unbelievable as it may appear, it is the fact of history that with the lapse of time and the decay of philosophical culture, the more ignorant came to take these dramatic heroes for actually living persons. And a designing priestcraft, either itself now sunken in similar ignorance, or motivated by piety or knavery, or both, found it advantageous to the interests of a worldly ecclesiastical system to connive at the misunderstanding. At any rate, the Gospels, which were only spiritual allegories (see the writings of Philo, Clement and Origen, and note Paul’s statement that the story of Abraham, Sarah and Hagar "is an allegory"), were about the third century converted into literal history. And it was at this juncture that the ancient meaning of the term "death" passed out of the ken of even the most learned of the leaders of Christianity, and with it fled all possibility of retaining or regaining the deep inner sense of the scheme of theology. Speaking advisedly, one may still freely assert that the obscuration of the inner meaning of "death" has utterly wrecked the science of theology. It has been the primary well-spring of that total illogicality and natural unseemliness in the scheme of theology which has so widely deprived it of intellectual support in the modern age. To a somewhat less extent, but still more considerably than has been surmised, it has militated likewise to hold in confusion some elements of the occult interpretation. It seems indeed to have escaped discovery universally, and all spiritual teaching everywhere has suffered in consequence. The first hints in the direction of the discovery were picked up when in the study of the great system of Greek thought known as Neo-Platonism, with its interpretations of Greek mythology and religion, one became aware of a peculiar handling of the idea of death. To convey just what is meant by this statement it will be necessary to quote a number of passages from the Greek writers themselves. They are in themselves quite valuable and should be more widely known. The most lucid renditions of Neo-Platonic ideas come to us though the translations of Thomas Taylor. We begin with a comment of Taylor’s own on Greek ideas regarding human life as a kind of death: "They believed that human souls were confined in the body as in a prison, a condition which they denominated genesis or generation, from which Dionysus would liberate them. This generation, which linked the soul to body, was supposed to be a kind of death to the higher form of life. Evil is inherent to this condition, the soul dwelling in the body as in a prison or a grave. . . . The earthly life is a dream rather than a reality . . . the soul is purified and separated from the evils of this condition by knowledge"--or what they called "philosophy". The great Plato is himself found saying that "men are placed in the body as in a prison" and that he considered "the body as the sepulchre of the soul". Taylor in discussing an opinion of Macrobius ascribed to him the conception that "the soul in the present life may be said to die, as far as it is possible for a soul to die; occultly intimating that the death of the soul was nothing more than a profound union with the ruinous bonds of the body." One noted that the incarnation or entry of the soul into the body was often alluded to as a burial! Then Pythagoras had written that "whatever we see when awake is death". Likewise the great Plotinus had given hints such as the following: "Death to the soul is to descend into matter and be entirely subjected to it. This is what is meant by falling asleep in Hades." As from an oppressive dream we wake now to perceive that the light that sould have streamed from these tomes of truly sacred lore and irradiated every dark recess of the human mind has been extinguished for over sixteen hundred years. By what mishap and through what culpable agency this bewildering catastrophe was precipitated, let research and inquiry determine. The staggering realization is that it did occur, with consequences that no mind is able to measure. God and Religion 06/08/2010
 (From the Aquarian Project Inner Potential Study Series, Lesson 9) Introduction The subject of God is almost impossible to talk about from a subjective point of view. There are so many views of God that, even within the same religion, there are differences. Another huge challenge is that people’s ideas of God tend to be fervent. It’s difficult to bring up the subject without appearing to be adversarial. And because people’s view of God is largely based on faith they are not used to thinking about it subjectively. There are not many “new” religions. The western world has been dominated by patriarchal monotheism for the last several thousand years. While the sacred books of these religions clearly have divinely inspired content, the Perception Problem discussed in lesson three suggests that the recipients of the messages would have been limited in what they were able to understand. Also, there are the challenges of cultural, language, and dispensation context that must be considered. Even the most devout religionist will acknowledge that God is beyond our understanding. So any issues that might not sit well with reason tend to take a back seat to God’s sovereignty. In the case of Christianity the penalty for not embracing the Bible is eternal and severe. In the dark ages the penalty was torture and death by fire. Until recently the Church and the government were one. The leaders of those governments were said to have been appointed by God, and as such enjoyed a divine sovereignty over the people they ruled. So, if you disagreed with the King you disagreed with God, and vice-versa. The fears that have been implanted into our mentality in this regard are formidable barriers to thinking critically about God. The Son of God The Son of God message has existed thousands of years before Jesus in the form of what are today called pagan religions. HORUS: The Egyptian Sun God Horus, worshipped around 3000 BC, was born of a virgin on December 25th. Three kings baring gifts followed an eastern star to the place of his birth. At 12 years old he became a teacher, and was baptized into ministry at the age of 30. He had 12 disciples who followed him as he went about healing the sick and performing miracles such as walking on water. Horus was called God’s anointed Son (Christ), The Truth, The Lamb of God, The Great Shepherd and many other familiar names. After being betrayed by his friend he was crucified, buried for 3 days, then rose from the dead. MITHRA: The Persian God Mithra appeared about 1200 BC and was still embraced by the Roman Empire as late as 300 AD when Christianity replaced it. Mithra incarnated into human form being born of a virgin on December 25th. He had 12 disciples and he went about healing the sick, and performing other miracles. He was executed and buried, and after 3 days he was resurrected. The sacred day of worship for Mithra was Sunday. ATTIS: The Greek God Attis, worshipped around 1200 BC was born of a virgin on December 25th, crucified, buried for 3 days, and then resurrected. KRISHNA: This East Indian God, worshipped heavily around 900 BC, was born of a virgin on December 25th heralded by a star in the east. He performed miracles, was crucified, and then resurrected. DIONYSUS: This Greek God was worshipped around 200 AD. He was born of a virgin on December 25th. He was a traveling teacher who performed miracles such as turning water into wine. He was referred to as the King of Kings, God’s Only Begotten Son, the Alpha and Omega, and other familiar names. He was crucified, buried, and then resurrected. Some historians claim that there were more than 60 such stories of the Son of God in ancient history, each with themes of 12 disciples, death, burial and resurrection. What can this mean? God and Religion Whatever message God is trying to relay to mankind seems to center around the themes of the Son of God, twelve disciples, crucifixion of the Son of God, his burial for three days, and his subsequent resurrection from the dead. Is it possible that religion has taken these stories too literally? Is there actually a secret or hidden message that lies at the foundation of our religions dogma? And if so, who has hidden the message, and why have they hidden it? And why doesn’t our modern religion teach the hidden message rather than its symbolism? Do our religious leaders today even know what that hidden message may be? In 325 AD when the Roman Emperor Constantine convened the Nicean Council his entire kingdom was in an uproar. On top of global political, economic, and social upheaval, Constantine had to contend with high ranking members within his own religious infrastructure who had begun to reveal to his fellows and to the common folk ancient esoteric information about the origins of the religion they all followed. The goal of the Nicean council was to create a standard by which heresy could be defined, thus providing a legal means of punishing anyone who disagreed with the emperor, and therefore God. Constantine’s Christianity literally became the law of the land. Paganism was suddenly a crime punishable by death, and those within his ranks who had been exposing secret truths were silenced or killed as heretics. What was this so-called heresy that was so effectively squashed by the Church during the inquisition and the “dark ages”? What information was Constantine trying to keep secret? What was it that the pagans and Constantine’s own people knew that might have been so damaging to the Church and, therefore, the empire? Could this information, if unchecked, have resulted in the kind of freedom and individual creative and imaginative thought that makes it difficult for a dictator to keep his subjects under control? Was the fear of punishment (both temporal and eternal) used as a tool to reinforce compliance with the Emperor’s divine authority? With the ratification and implementation of the Nicean Council’s doctrine Constantine, in one fell swoop, secured his empire’s global political, social, economic, and religious sovereignty and the supremacy and longevity of the Church for himself and his posterity. Even today one third of the population of earth claims to be followers of the Constantinian doctrine (Christianity). The Bottom Line Religion is not the enemy. God is not our antagonist, neither are we God’s. Religion can’t stop us from walking in love, nor can it force us to do so. There is nothing more beautiful than a supple heart that wants to know and follow God, and expresses that desire through altruism rather than mere words, doctrine, or dogma. This is what the Bible calls “True Religion”. The legacy of suppression of hidden information through fear of punishment for the purpose of controlling the masses remains with us today like an old useless habit that it ‘s time to abandon. Who Is The Real You? 06/05/2010
 (From the Aquarian Project Inner Potential Study Series, Lesson 8) Introduction When we look in the mirror we see an image of what we suppose is ourselves. But what are we really seeing? In lessons two and three we discovered that 1) what we observe is strictly a product of perception, and 2) the reality we perceive is literally made of almost nothing. This applies not only to what we assume is outside of us, but to our own bodies as well, since the only evidence we have that our bodies exist is our senses. The sensations of observation, feeling/touching, hearing, tasting and smelling do not reflect something that is happening outside of our body, but is rather our minds’ perception of electrical and chemical brain data. Only frustration can result from trying to prove that our perceptions are real, as the only tools we have are our senses which are very limited in scope and efficacy. The misnomer of a physical self actually refers only to waves of subatomic energy that only seem to have substance based on our perception. So then, the man in the mirror is not real at all but only a trick of the mind. So, who are we really? The Avatar Let us now conjecture about an alternative explanation of who we really are. The American Heritage dictionary defines Avatar as “A temporary manifestation or aspect of a continuing entity”. If matter is not real but a sort of hologram, and everything we perceive in this world is the result of electro/chemical reactions in our brains, then perhaps we have been looking in the wrong places for answers to our important questions. What if, rather than physical beings walking around in a physical world, the real us is a “continuing entity” that has no physical form who is using this world – a holographic matrix – as a means of expressing its consciousness within a context of subjectivity and relativity? What if the realm of pure consciousness and objectivity from which this “source entity” comes is unsuitable for it to experience such a stimulating scenario? What if, over time, separation has inaccurately preempted relativity in our perception experience? Individual Manifestations of Source What is the origin of this sensation of existence that we all have and share together? If what we suppose is the real us is not the real us – and in fact is not real at all – then who is the real us, where does the real us really live, and what is really real? Could our “physical” existence be some sort of experiment orchestrated by the true Source of all things? Could we as humans have forgotten the true nature of this experiment somewhere along the line because the illusion seems so real? So, then, is the human experience in this world simply a temporary manifestation of the real us… an opportunity for the perfect infinite objective Source to experience “imperfection”, finite-ness, and subjectivity? For this “experiment” to work it would require that the singular Source divide itself up into myriad manifestations, and then that each of those individual manifestations forget who they really are once the Avatar is in place. It would be like a sort of cosmic video game wherein the Avatar in the game thinks it’s the real entity when all the time the true entity is the one in control of the joystick, incarnated only to participate in the experiment. But has someone else taken control instead? It would seem that the forgetfulness required to make this experiment meaningful has been taken advantage of by an unscrupulous element – let’s call it oligarchy for lack of a better word – for the purpose of harvesting the potential of the Avatar to fulfill its own selfish ends. Perhaps this oligarchy has insidiously modified our forgetfulness, directing it toward self-defeating sentiments and behaviors, consequently keeping the Avatar from experiencing the freedom creativity and joy that this holographic matrix was designed to host. This way the oligarchy could become vicarious creators of what they wanted, rather than each individual creating their own reality to their own liking. Think about it. How easy would it be for someone with ulterior motives who was fully aware of the true nature of our existence to first hide that information from us, and then to convince us that their version of reality was true instead? I submit that it would be very simple. And it would also explain allot of things. Maybe the truth is that we are not enemies of God trying to get back into favor with him, or hapless products of a random accident of evolution. Maybe the true enemy is we ourselves – people who have bought into the greatest con ever known and have given someone else our creative potential without even realizing it. Free will has its disadvantages! If there is any truth to the above scenario then the root enemy is ignorance alone. What’s The Purpose? If we as a species are not living the life we were meant to live, but have been enslaved through our own ignorance, then what really is our purpose on earth? What’s the ultimate purpose of this illusion into which the Avatar has been immersed? What if the purpose is creativity, individuality, experimentation, discovery, and FUN! Are we all experiencing these things to the degree that we might if the suggested scenario were accurate? The Bottom Line In offering any theory the evidence must fit the model for the theory to be considered viable. Let us then examine a common model of human existence for this purpose. This course has thus far revealed that the model of our existence as humans comprises the following elements: 1) That which appears to be real is not real. 2) That which we perceive is 100% subjective. 3) The majority of people in the world don’t have what they want or what they need. 4) There is more than enough for everyone. 5) A very small oligarchy owns the majority of the world’s wealth based on the efforts of the majority. 6) Traditional answers about our world don’t make any sense and/or only dig us deeper into a hole. 7) We are aware that we exist but we don’t know where that awareness comes from. 8) We don’t know why we are here, where we came from, or where we are going. 9) Our decisions in life are unavoidably guided by subjective predisposition arising from conditioning instilled by other things and people. 10) Those who believe they have the answers can’t prove it, and won’t really know if they’re right until they die. In the mean time they are obedient. If in our heart we feel there is some truth to what this lesson suggests then we owe it to ourselves to do some real research on the issue. We may be surprised by what we discover. Physics Proves Parallel Universes Exist 04/26/2010
 "Proves" is a strong word. But the results of the experiment conducted at the University of California is about as compelling as evidence can get. The significance of this experiment may be lost to many. But for the last few scores of years physics has presented a picture of the universe that, rather than appearing to be science may seem more like science fiction; rather than Christopher Columbus' discovery of land, may seem more like Alice's discovery of wonderland. The mind stretching theories of the constitution of the physical universe that have surfaced over the past 60 years or so vis a vie Quantum Physics, String Theory, M (Membrane) Theory, et al (which have been based upon both mathematics and imperial evidence) have been fantastic enough that even Einstein himself protested their validity, insisting that "God does not play dice". Little wonder that the average person has difficulty with some of these newer theories. But much like Einstein's own theory about the existence of black holes was criticized, then finally "proven" as actual phenomena, the existence of multiple universes now seems more viable than ever. While there have been other significant physics experiments that have provided compelling evidence in confirmation of more modern theories they have all been done on a micro level. Up until now the consensus has been that these phenomena didn't appear to work on the macro level. This is the first experiment that supports the modern theories of physics using objects in the macro... i.e. a level observable to the naked eye. The implications are immense and far reaching. See the article below. Thanks, Steve Wave11:11 http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/04/05/freaky-physics-proves-parallel-universes/ Are You a Chrisitan or a Constantinian? 04/09/2010
 There are many devoutly religious people who find it difficult to accept certain hidden or esoteric elements of "spirituality". That which is considered "occult" (a word which simply means hidden, as in not well known) is shunned as satanic or evil. But few people are aware of why the occult creates such deep-seeded feelings of fear and taboo. While many who profess to be Christians will quickly embrace Jesus as the Son of God, and the Bible as the Word of God many of these same people are unaware of the Constantinian origins of the Bible. Constantine was a Roman emperor who transformed the defunct Roman empire into the new Christianity... that form of Christianity which gave us the Bible. Before Constantine created his new religion - roughly around 325 AD - all major religions including Christianity were steeped in the occult, i.e. those hidden teachings which brought enormous temporal and esoteric benefits to mankind. But Constantine would have none of this. Through the creation of the Nicean Council Constantine was able to suppress all esoteric elements of Christianity and other religions in a move to consolidate his religious, social, and political powers. To practice or even mention things like reincarnation, magic, paganism, etc. was a crime punishable by death. That legacy lives on today as many conscientious Christians still cringe at the mere mention of anything that doesn't appear to be condoned by the Bible. But this was constantine's plan to begin with. There was no power but the emporer, and no religion but the emporer's religion. This was not a spiritual move, but a political one. This legacy of fear and prohibition lives on today with incalculable effetcs. So, if you get spooked at the mention of ancient sciences (yes they are sciences) like astrology, metaphysics, symbolism, sacred geometry, etc. you are a victim of Constantinianism. (Don't try to look that word up... I just coined it so it may be a few years before Webster picks it up) |      AuthorKeith David Henry ArchivesMarch 2012 CategoriesAll  |
RSS Feed